Your wedding day holds significance. It will undoubtedly be etched in your memory forever. Naturally, you aspire for this day to be flawless. That encompasses preserving those moments through photography. While a friend with a high-end camera might kindly offer to capture the essence of your day, entrusting a professional wedding photographer guarantees outcomes for various reasons. [Read more…] about Reasons Why You Should Hire a Professional Wedding Photographer
Short films are essentially motion pictures that do not have long enough running time to be considered a feature film. They ideally are 40 minutes or less. In fact, a short film can be just 30 seconds long. To qualify as a short film at many film festivals its running time has to be less than 15 minutes. Short films can be of any genre or method/mode of filmmaking. Many people gain hands-on experience in filmmaking by making short films and eventually move to feature films. While Bruce Weber Photographer is mostly renowned for his photography career, he has also made many short films, documentaries, and feature films over the years. [Read more…] about Bruce Weber Photographer Talks About The Features Of A Good Short Film
There are various drone photography services and video editing activities in Perth that elevate the visual experience. When the objects around a person are viewed and captured from an artificial and unmanned device that is at a height, it is known as drone photography. Also, there are a variety of video-making methods that employ merging periods and manipulating time frames. These two methods add a dash of style to one’s enjoyable pursuits. [Read more…] about Drone Photography And Time-Lapse Video Making
Pregnancy is wonderful, but not always. There are some benefits to pregnancy like radiant skin, lush locks, and a lovely baby belly, but there are also drawbacks like aching joints, tiger stripes, and mood changes. As a result, many pregnant mothers wonder whether it’s even worth it to glam up for the cameras during the time they feel less confident and comfortable.
To make things worse, watching Instagram models might even make them feel ashamed of their big bellies. On a positive note, celebrities and models have made the trend of maternity photoshoots popular in recent years. By recording and sharing their precious moments with the world, they encourage other mothers to do the same. If you want to schedule a maternity photoshoot, then contact maternityphotographerflorida.com. You can entrust them to handle your delicate phase with ease by providing you with stunning results.
While the stigma remains in some circles, women celebrating their pregnancies by opting for a photoshoot is becoming far more common. They are feeling less uncomfortable in front of the camera during the maternity period now more than ever. Pregnant women want to cherish their pregnancy and preserve it which is why the growing trend of maternity photoshoots is nowhere near its end. It is certainly a huge moment in your life and one that you can celebrate by making it even more beautiful through a photo shoot.
Social media has normalized the sharing of personal moments, making photoshoots for young parents a common practice. People have been inspired and driven to commemorate their own lives by celebrities who have stepped out of their safety zone. It can be intimidating at first but once you get comfortable in your skin, there’s nothing that can pull you back. Even if you don’t feel great about your pregnancy, you should get maternity photos because your body is performing an absolutely beautiful thing. Pregnancy isn’t always fun but you will never regret taking a snap of your bulging baby bump.
Most women are willing to share this private moment with the world in today’s day and age. They are photographed throughout their pregnancy or during the maternity period. Maternity photographs capture the beauty of the new mother’s increasing baby belly. Maternal photoshoot sessions are best booked around the third or second trimester. The planning time is flexible. It usually starts around the time the belly is visible.
Pregnancy does not always make you look good. As a matter of fact, most pregnant women experience a loss of confidence. However, your swelling belly is hardly the ideal excuse to forgo snapping pictures for nine months! At the end of the day, you realize you are creating a human being, and that is good enough to rejoice! The pregnancy melancholia may be treated by dressing up, applying makeup, and indulging oneself in a photoshoot. It is possible you may even be shocked by how stunning you seem in your images.
Every piece of art you come across is owned by someone. That includes every piece of music, every painting, and every photographs. How much works of art are licensed is up to those who own them. Know this: creative licensing is a sticky issue that often sees the two sides in a licensing dispute wind up in court.
Such was the case following the death of pop musician Prince in 2016. A dispute arose between the Andy Warhol Foundation and a well-known photographer by the name of Lynn Goldsmith. You might already recognize Warhol’s name given that he was one of the most prolific modern artists of his day. Goldsmith is a well-known photographer whose work has adorned record album sleeves and CD covers for decades.
At issue was how Goldsmith’s early 1980s photographs of Prince could be licensed in the years after his death. One of the photographs was licensed by Vanity Fair so that Warhol could create a number of illustrated works from it, including a magazine cover. Warhol died in 1987.
The Warhol Foundation-Goldsmith suit resulted from the Foundation’s use of Warhol’s magazine cover to promote his works. Goldsmith contended that the photograph from which the work was produced was licensed only for that purpose. She contended that the original license allowing Warhol to create his work did not extend to allowing the Foundation to license the work for a 2016 magazine piece on Prince.
The court initially sided with the Foundation. They determined that Warhol’s work was substantially transformative to the point that his piece was completely separate from the original Goldsmith picture. An appeals court disagreed. They ruled that Warhol’s painting was essentially his rendering of a recognized photograph. The appeals court also cautioned lower courts against trying to determine just how transformative a work of art is.
The appeals court ruling followed the same principles that apply to licensing the books and screenplays that eventually become movies. Separate licenses are required at every step of the journey from manuscript to celluloid.
The whole issue between the Warhol Foundation and Goldsmith boils down to the complicated nature of commercial photography. It is not clear whether or not Goldsmith ever intended her Prince pictures to be used commercially. But she did license them for commercial use when Vanity Fair came calling. Furthermore, every time she licenses a photograph to a musician or promotion company, she is licensing it for commercial use.
Likewise, Salt Lake City’s Vargo Photography produces a lot of commercial photography. Vargo does corporate headshots, for example. They also do brand photography as well as shooting food, consumer products, and so forth.
The question is this: does Vargo retain ownership of those photos and license them to customers, or do customers maintain ownership of the images? Either way, the images have to be licensed by the owner for any use outside of their original commission.
In the Goldsmith case, the Foundation argued that it was licensing work it owned – that being the magazine cover Warhol produced for Vanity Fair. Goldsmith countered that Warhol’s work was just her work in illustrated form. She maintained that she ultimately controlled its licensing.
Creative licensing is a tricky thing at the commercial level. It all boils down to compensating genuine creativity by those who produce commercial-worthy work. No doubt this most recent ruling will be challenged by another case somewhere down the road. For now, it is clear that courts should concern themselves with standard copyright law rather than determining the transformative nature of an artist’s work.